Why poor Walt should have seen a Financial Adviser

Why poor Walt should
have seen a Financial Adviser
For those of you who haven’t seen the hit TV series Breaking Bad, the story follows Walt, a chemistry teacher who’s diagnosed with lung cancer and his radical approach to ensuring the financial security of his family on his editable demise.
If you put Walt’s money laundering, corruption, extortion and generally becoming a criminal mastermind aside, would Walt have acted differently if he had known that he would be diagnosed with lung cancer?  He probably would have.
Obviously not counting the numerous laws he’s breaking, Walt’s real predicament is that he should have seen a Financial Adviser earlier in life and had simple family income benefit policy put in place.  This would mean that whether he was diagnosed with lung cancer or suffered a fatal accident his family would have received a lump sum pay out and/or monthly income for the rest of their dependency and his whole life of crime could have been prevented.
We are a society that is very quick to assume that we will never be diagnosed with a terminal or critical illness or be involved in a fatal accident.  But if that were to happen, what would your family do?
Life insurance is not as expensive as you think considering the consequences of not ensuring the financial security of your family, should something happen.  Why not speak to a Financial Adviser today?

Are you a member of the Sandwich ….

Are you a member of the sandwich generation?
The term ‘Sandwich Generation’ typically defines people
between the ages of 45 and 60 who are caring for both elderly parents and
children.
Research conducted by Aviva in 2014 has shown that most
people are aware of becoming ‘sandwiched’ but don’t plan for things like:
·
Reducing their working hours (and income) to
care for an elderly parent.
·
Helping an elderly parent/child with
rent/mortgage payments
·
Helping out children that rely on the ‘bank on
mum and dad’ whilst in further education.
If this is something you are concerned about, contact us on
01636 870 069.

The Real Cost of Cash

Why do we use cash so much for our investments? I think the main
reasons centre on the fact that it’s a safe investment.

But that’s not entirely the full picture….
Inflation is eating away at your savings or cash investments
every single day, inflation can wipe out its value just because its sitting in
a bank account.
Why: The Technical bit
The Consumer Prices Index (CPI) is 2.9% the very best Fixed
rate Cash ISA is 2.75% (Virgin Money 2.75% for five years fixed). Even with the
best Cash ISA you’re losing 0.15% each year. It gets worse if your money isn’t
in ISA’s as you’ll pay tax on the interest. The best non ISA savings bond is
3.5% (Skipton 3.5% fixed 7 years) take off tax (20%) you’re down to 2.8%, then
inflation and you are down to a loss of 0.1%.
All the above assumes you are using CPI index not the more
well known RPI which is higher at 3.3%, use this and the figures look somewhat
worse, add in that you could be a higher rate tax payer and the loss per year
is quite startling.
From 2002 to 2012 the total rate of inflation has been
37.80%, between 1992 & 2002 its been 27.22% and between 1982 and 1992,
70.74%.
If you invested £50,000 in tax-free cash savings in 2002 and
spent the interest (a common situation for older people who need to top up
their pensions) in 2012 you would have a sum worth £34,011 in real terms.
Interestingly the average interest rates over the same period
(source-Association of Building Society’s) is 3.91% so taking into account
inflation & interest you would have a miserable £650 extra in real terms,
if you hadn’t spent the interest.
Therefore Are Cash Investments & Cash ISA’s. SAFE?
Not against inflation that’s for sure, this demonstrates that
we should not use CASH for long-term investments. Short-term cash is ok; foregoing
growth or income because we intend to spend the money. But, for longer-term,
losing money each year against the costs of those items that you intend to buy
seems a little foolhardy to me.
What about for those topping up pension income? There are
two major problems facing people at present, inflation we have already
discussed, ignore inflation the interest rates themselves are insufficient to
maintain the income requirement for most and their lump sum is being eaten away
in real and actual terms. The current rates of return on cash investments are
simply insufficient.
Is there a solution?
Yes: The facts are longer term investments, such as fixed
interests, bonds, gilts and equities and there are more such as property, art,
fine wine, cars and antiques, which usually outperform cash. What’s the price of
a better return? RISK. I have always felt that it is a simple truism of life: That
the more risk one takes, the higher the potential for rewards, but like
Newton’s 3rd Law. With the higher potential for reward comes the
higher potential for loss. So like many other things in life, Investment Risk
is a balance. 
Look at these examples:
A house purchased at £50,000 in 2002 would have been valued
at £85,000 in 2012 – above inflation growth and it appears a fairly low risk
investment. Bricks and Mortar investments & Buy to lets are increasingly common,
but there are more risks associated with property than many realise – we can
offer buy to let advance and help in setting up your investment portfolio,
letting you understand the risks. (Source Nationwide house price index)
A Medium/ cautious risk fund such as the Invesco Perpetual
Monthly Income Plus – £50,000 invested in 2002 would now be worth around
£120,990. This is the gross amount, but there are many straightforward ways to
minimise the affect of tax on your investments, ISA’s for example are not
limited to just over £5000 per year currently in equity ISA’s you can invest
£12,520. Add this to a capital gains tax allowance each year and there is every
chance that the impact of tax would be significantly less than a
straightforward savings account. This fund mainly invests in Gilts, fixed
interests and bonds with currently 20% invested in equities, the fund is
available in a number of formats such as ISA’s and through many platforms.
(Source – Morningstar Fund Data)
A Higher risk fund (keeping with the same brand) is the
Invesco Perpetual High Income fund managed by the very highly regarded Neil
Woodford. If you had invested £50,000 in this fund 10 years ago, this would now
be worth – £168,475. With regard to tax and availability the same is true about
this fund as above. (Source – Morningstar Fund Data)
I have not taken inflation into account with the above
examples of the house, and the two funds for the simple reason that there is no
need its fairly clear that the effects of inflation will have some impact, but
all three examples out perform either the CPI or the RPI, and therefore you
would have kept your money or increased it.
Conclusions – Moderation in all things.
Is cash “A bit rubbish really” well yes it is if your
investing for the long term, don’t have any specific goals in mind or just need
an income, but cash investments do have a role to play within any portfolio of
investments. They give us a safety buffer, they are a safe place for money
that’s going to be needed, but for anything else investments of a different
type are necessary, investment advice is really worth seeking out to see how
you can reduce the impact of inflation on your savings and investments.  
Philip Dales Dip PFS Certs CII (MP&ER)
Director
For more information or advice on Investments contact Philip
Dales at DALES Independent Financial Advisers: advice@pndales.co.uk or go to our web
site www.pndales.co.uk or call our West
Bridgford office: 0115 832 0265 or Newark Office: 01636 870 069
Important information.
The investment returns and any income can fluctuate, and
investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance is not a
guide to future returns. Where Philip Dales has expressed views and opinions
these may change and do not constitute a recommendation. For individually
tailored advice please contact either our West Bridgford (Nottingham) office
0115 832 0265 or our Newark office on 01636 870 069
Sources: All CPI and RPI data – Office of National
Statistics, Fund information – Morningstar, Savings & ISA rates– Moneyfacts.
Historical Average Savings rates – Association of Building Societies. House
price growth – Nationwide Building Society’s House price Index.
P N DALES LTD are regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority: 496107.

First Time Buyers & Stamp Duty Land Tax

More Innovation for First Time Buyers


Stamp Duty Paid Mortgages 

Would you like someone to pay your stamp duty, perhaps you’ve saved up just enough for that nice shiny new house, but now have to set aside even more than you’d bargained for, to pay the tax man. 
Currently the rate for Stamp Duty is 1% on Properties valued at £125,001 through to £250,000, it doesn’t end there if the purchase price is higher the percentage increases, but for now lets assume that your buying between £125,001 and £250,000 as a first time buyer. 
So need a hand with your Stamp Duty, well Halifax’s new products may just be for you!
On Tuesday the 30th April Halifax will launch an innovative product range, of Stamp Duty paid mortgages for First time Buyers. Halifax will pay 100% of the Stamp Duty Land Tax due on selected products for first time buyers that fall into the 1% bracket (Purchase price between £125,001 and £250,000). 
There is a choice of products available, across the core range, Affordable housing, Help to Buy/ First Buy, NewBuy and MI New Home products. 
In essence the Stamp Duty Land Tax will be paid via a cash back arrangement, where the cash back is equal to the stamp duty, this will be paid to the conveyancer on completion.

Halifax have a wide range of products to suit most client types, and generally their rates are well placed within the market, criteria is consistent with their main competitors, so this offers a real opportunity to first time buyers, particularly when you consider that this is available on their Affordable housing, Home Buy/ First Buy, New Buy and MI New Homes scheme and their core range.

Full details of the new products are not available until tomorrow, but in the mean time this looks like a very positive step forward for First time borrowers, maybe now is the time to start looking at buying your first house!

Philip Dales Dip PFS Certs CII (MP & ER)
Director

For more information or advice on First Time Buyer Mortgages, Standard Purchases & Remortgages and other types of mortgages contact Philip Dales at DALES Independent Financial Advisers: Advice@pndales.co.uk, or go to our web site www.pndales.co.uk. Nottingham office: 0115 832 0265 or Newark Office: 01636 87 00 69.

The information above is for information purposes only, it does not constitute advice, for advice suitable to your personal circumstances please contact us directly and we will be happy to help.

For mortgages, P N DALES Ltd do charge fees, a typical fee for mortgage advice and processing is £350. 


DALES Independent Financial Advisers, Nottingham (West Bridgford) & Newark. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority: 496107.

Mortgage Market Review & You

MORTGAGE MARKET REVIEW –
REGULATION OR MARKET CREATION & CONTROL

How will this affect you, the
consumer?
As consumers you may or may
not be aware of the Financial Services Authority’s mortgage market review.  This was a review conducted by the FSA over
the last few years, of how the mortgage market conducts itself.  This review was heavily influenced by the
financial crash in 2008.  The FSA issued
the policy statement (PS12/16) and the final rules which will come into effect
on 26 April 2014.  However, in the
majority of cases, most lenders have anticipated these rule changes within
their criteria or have already put into force those items raised by these new regulations.  These new regulations fundamentally alter the
mortgage market for you as consumers. 
So, I would advise all consumers to make themselves familiar with some
of these new regulations.  The following
is an example of the type of changes and how it will affect you, but I would
suggest that the regulator is not regulating but defining the market.

INTEREST ONLY MORTGAGES

An example of how these regulations
will affect you is a very lose term called responsible lending.  These terms are deliberately lose so that
each lender may interpret, and therefore be hung by, the regulations themselves.  So, how does it affect interest only?  The majority of lenders will now not accept
interest only in its strictest sense unless the loan to value is extremely
small and is backed up by investment products such as endowments.  Given the fiasco in the past over endowments
and miss-selling of endowments, in effect this kills the concept of an
endowment-linked interest only mortgage. 
Also these interpretations go further; in the past if you wanted an
interest only mortgage you would set up a repayment vehicle such as an
endowment or modern day an ISA at point of application.  However, these new changes preclude this as
the endowment or ISA needs to be existing prior to application.  This wasn’t even a requirement before the
endowment miss-selling scandal. 
Therefore again, killing new interest only, asset backed mortgage
applications.  Only those clients who have
been on interest only with asset baked provisions can obtain a new interest
only mortgage.  How about if you wanted
an interest only mortgage on the basis of selling your property to
downsize?  There are a handful of lenders
that will consider this but, of those, the majority will only accept the application
if you can prove that you either have 50% loan to value and/or sufficient
equity and capital resources to have over £150,000 at the end of the mortgage
term.  So, again, this kills the interest
only mortgage market.
But why is this a problem?  When comparing the financial benefits of a
repayment verses an asset backed interest only mortgage, or indeed resale of
property interest only mortgage, one should consider investment returns long
term versus interest rates and also house price increase on the basis of later
sale.  Right now, the Bank of England
base rate is ½% so I think most people would agree with me that we are in a low
interest period.  I think most people
would also agree that house prices are at an all-time low.  Also, one has to consider that if you were to
put £10,000 in a cash- based ISA you can achieve a return of 3 or 3½%.  One wold also suggest that if you were to put
your money in an equity based ISA whilst very volatile, again it would be fair
and reasonable to suggest that you would achieve 5% return in the medium to
long term.  So if these are compared,
clearly from a financial point of view it would be fair to suggest that an
asset based mortgage would be financially more astute than a repayment mortgage.  Classically, in a high interest rate period,
a repayment mortgage is better than as asset backed product on the basis that
one would have to achieve such high levels of growth to outperform the high
interest rate.  With this in mind I would
actually argue that, right now, interest only should not be being killed by the
regulator as it is a fully justifiable and potentially financially astute
repayment method, but if the only people that can have it are those detailed
above, ie those that have already had it, then the regulator is controlling the
market not regulating the market because, clearly, one should be allowed to
consider this type of arrangement.
If you would like more
information on how the mortgage market review may affect you or require
financial or mortgage advice please contact 01636 870 069 for your free
consultation.
Philip Dales Dip PFS Certs
CII (MP & ER)
DALES Independent Financial
Advisors, are a whole of market mortgage broker and Independent Financial Advisors.
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority.